Wharton Alumni Magazine
Winter 2004
Home Archives About Us Connections

Table of Contents

Features

Making News

Unraveling the DNA of Technology-Based Businesses

The Numbers Behind the Notes

Departments

Wharton Now

Knowledge@Wharton

Alumni Association Update

Leadership Spotlight

Continued from previous page

John Daniszewski, W'79, Reporting from Baghdad

In many ways, John Daniszewski's career couldn't be different from Uygur's. While Uygur had little idea what his future held while he was at Penn, Daniszewski quickly wedded himself to The Daily Pennsylvanian and to journalism. He was already freelancing for The Associated Press by the time he graduated.

John Daniszewski "Wharton was a serendipitous choice," Daniszewski writes in an e-mail from his current post as Baghdad correspondent for the Los Angeles Times. "It gave me an advantage as a journalist in that I have always felt fairly at ease with economic topics, polls and corporate statements. Courses I took in economics and finance, international business, statistics and labor law have all helped me out through the years, whether it was covering a labor dispute in the Pennsylvania steel industry or the solidarity strikes in Poland."

Indeed, it's difficult to overestimate the leg up basic business classes give journalists. Even one statistics class makes covering political polls and scientific studies a cinch. Accounting and finance make dissecting most corporate earnings statements a breeze. Management classes make communicating with corporate officers easier and handling one's own career negotiations less mysterious.

As an Associated Press newsman, Daniszewski excelled at all of the above. After joining AP full-time after graduation, he transferred to Harrisburg in 1980, New York in 1981, Warsaw, Poland in 1987, and finally to Johannesburg, South Africa as bureau chief in 1993.

The Los Angeles Times came calling in 1996, and it was with that newspaper—known as a haven for some of the industry's best writers—that Daniszewski went to the Middle East. He moved to Moscow in 2000, but returned to the Middle East last year to cover the war in Iraq.

"It was a difficult choice to leave my family in Moscow and wait out the war in Baghdad," Daniszewski writes. "I definitely had the feeling I might not get out of it alive... But I thought that even with the danger and the obstacles, it was worth-while to report the course of the war as best I could, and give readers that side of the story.'"

For Daniszewski, the professional reward came when U.S. troops entered Baghdad on April 9. He says it was one of the most exciting days of his journalism career because he saw people who were previously afraid to speak their minds cheer when the statue of Saddam Hussein came down.

Since then, the story has become more complex, with more nuances. All the problems of the occupation—skyrocketing crime; the lack of electricity, clean water, telecommunications and jobs—have in some ways overshadowed those first joyous moments.

And now Baghdad has become a dangerous place again, with soldiers, aid workers and contractors all being increasingly targeted by insurgents.

But since so much is at stake for Americans, for Iraqis and for the rest of the world in putting the country back together and creating a stable and prosperous Iraq, Daniszewski feels fortunate to have the opportunity to write about these great and decisive issues.

They are, of course, also highly controversial issues. Daniszewski recalls one recent story he wrote about American forces evacuating the family home of a member of the Iraqi resistance, then bombing the house. The story thoroughly documented that at least one of the people who lived there was responsible for a guerilla attack that killed an American soldier. The piece also documented the lengths to which U.S. troops had gone to in order to protect the women and children who lived in the home: giving them notice to leave, allowing them to pack up some belongings, and destroying the house only when it was empty.

Still, a reader complained that the Los Angeles Times was biased against the war because a photo that ran with the story showed a woman who had lived in the house in tears near the wreckage. The reader believed the story showed too much sympathy for Iraqis, but Daniszewski maintains the story was unbiased.

"The country is rebuilding and schools are being reopened...but you can't close your eyes to the reality," he says. "We have no purpose in being here unless we try to give our best take about what is going on. It's not like we are going out and looking for the bad things."

Back to Top
Back 4 of 6 Next
The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania Home | Archives | About Us | Connections

Copyright © 2002 The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved.