Wharton Alumni Magazine
Summer 2004
Home Archives About Us Connections

Table of Contents

Features

Connections That Run Deep

The Value of Experience

You Are What You Buy

Departments

Wharton Now

Knowledge@Wharton

Next Up at Wharton School Publishing

Alumni Association Update

Leadership Spotlight

Continued from previous page

Bolton's study of identity based judgement builds on earlier work that investigates "stickiness" in judgement, i.e., the tendency for judgements to persevere. Her dissertation, for instance, looked at what happens when managers launching new products base forecasts on past experience rather than analytic predictions. "Forecasts were stickier when based on analogies or scenarios rather than analytic thinking," Bolton says. "This suggests that managers may be overconfident about a product's success, continuing to invest in it or in a project when evidence suggests otherwise."

Another study, titled "Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness," found that price perceptions are sticky: consumers tend to believe that prices are unfair, and reminding them of inflation and other costs does little to improve their fairness perceptions. The research, Bolton says, points to a gap between how consumers and managers think—a gap managers should acknowledge if they want to change customer attitudes.

Other work has a definite social welfare bent, such as research that investigated how the marketing of "remedy" products such as nicotine replacement patches, the now-ubiquitous debt consolidation loan, and identity theft insurance and software ultimately affect consumer behavior. The good news, the studies found, was that for consumers "outside of the problem domain," i.e., non-smokers or those with little personal debt, "remedy messages" reinforced perceptions that the behavior is risky and should be avoided. The bad news? Smokers and over spenders tended to perceive remedy products as 'get out of jail free cards,' ultimately increasing their problem behavior. And when it came to identity theft, consumers were more inclined to take risks, such as sharing personal information when shopping on websites, if they had purchased identity theft insurance or software.

"The companies are really careful about how they position their messages," Bolton says. "But somehow you always get the feeling in the end that the consumer is walking away thinking 'Gee, this isn't so risky after all, because of the remedy.' The remedy marketers' messages undermine the risk-avoidance messages of just-say-no campaigns, for example. We'd all be better off if we didn't smoke and get into too much debt, but the remedies suggest to consumers that maybe we can get away with it. Put this way, it seems that risky behavior is sticky and hard to change too."

Born and raised in the countryside near Toronto, Bolton was an officer in the Canadian forces, then worked for five years as a medical engineer at several Canadian teaching hospitals. She took a year off and traveled the world before deciding to earn her PhD at the University of Florida, a school known for its strong marketing program, where she met professor Reed and the two first began discussing issues of identity and judgement.

Her work is all about stickiness, but didn't start out that way. "I was initially very interested in how judgements are formed and how they change, and I studied this in contexts where judgement is very important, like new product forecasting and consumer price perceptions. Along the way, I discovered that some kinds of judgements seem to be more difficult to change, and I decided to explore this more."

"Stickiness isn't always a bad thing," Bolton continues.

"Sometimes, it's good to stick to your guns or persevere with an initial judgment—if it's correct. But stickiness can be bad if it leads us astray and prevents us from adapting to new information in our environment. On the flip side of the stickiness coin, my research also explores ways to change or take the bias out of judgment—for example, by prompting people to engage in more analytic pro-and-con reasoning, to generate alternative scenarios and analogies, to adopt counter-identities. I hope that some of these tools may prove useful in overcoming the stickiness of an initial judgment and ultimately help managers and consumers make better decisions."

Nancy Moffitt is a frequent contributor to and former editor of the Wharton Alumni Magazine.

Back to Top
Back 3 of 3 End
The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania Home | Archives | About Us | Connections

Copyright © 2002 The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved.